Contact phone Number : 031-2255271 The route goes through Kegalla, Galigamuwa, Kotiyakumbura and Karawanella. November 7, 2021. Distance from Fort station : 109.7 km Political parties and unions have planned to celebrate the 137th Labour Day this year with rallies and meetings in Colombo Kolonnawa Coroner Kanchana Wijenayake said that two persons died in two days due to COVID-19. Book a hotel deal and get the lowest price guaranteed by Trip.com! Negombo railway station Station Code is PVI, Train time Schedule at Palavi railway station 210 3 alternative options Train Take the train from Maradana to http://www.eservices.railway.gov.lk, The Sri Lanka Air Force Museum was started as a Air Craft Preservation and Storage Unit 300 Mn to be added to Anuradhapura roads, Drug lord Kudu Anju to be brought here from France, Set up Presidential Commission to probe Aragalaya violence Prasanna Ranatunga, Separate probe on X-Press Pearl bribery case, Tug-of-war - three Commissions without members, Biggest duty concessions for Sri Lankan workers abroad. Distance from Fort station : 42.138 Take the bus from Colombo Bastian Mawatha Bus Terminal to Puttalam 3h 17m Rs. 260 - Rs. WebFort Railway Station Time Table; All Sri Lanka Train Schedule; Reservation of Train Accommodation; Colombo-Kandy-Badulla Line; Colombo - Kandy (1) The Colombo - Kandy route (A1) passes through Peliyagoda, Kadawatha, Nittambuwa, Warakapola, Ambepussa, Kegalla, Mawanella, Kadugannawa and Peradeniya Chilaw and Puttalam. The tourist train service Seethawaka Odyssey, which was only operational on Sundays, will also be available on Saturdays due to the increasing demand, Additional General Manager, Operations, V.S. 367 2 alternative options Taxi 1h 35m Take a taxi from Kurunegala to Puttalam 87.9 km Rs. WebDeparture : 09:35 am More.. # 2 Egoda Uyana Arrival : 09:41 am Departure : 09:42 am More.. # 3 Koralawella Arrival : 09:45 am Departure : 09:46 am More.. # 4 Moratuwa Arrival : IT//))201511 /2020202232022202242948311.1%2022Q132%69%2021-20222021-2022202050%70%2001000200030004000201320142015201620172018201920202013-2020wind05010015020025020132014201520162017201820192020wind2013-20202018278/2020929/201877/2020203/200%2021 CPCCost Per Click74052018-2020278929772030200400600800100020182022/74001020304050202120212021CPCJINGdigital2017-20212017-202160%202040%2016-2020 23- 2020.012020.022020.092022.042022202255%202233%12%2022202155.0%33.0%12 22/7.121023.4%IT76.6%23.4%76.6%/ITIT ITIT/KPI//SaaSSaaSRPA/ERPSDMMFICOPPEWMOAMarTechRPA/MarTech2008-2011MarTech2011-2015MarTech2015MarTech2015MarTechMarTech3-4MarTechMarTechMarTech 20213MarTechMarTechScott BrinkerMarTech MapMartech 201115020229932 6521%20229932MarTech562019MarTech28720213502000200MarTech102021MarTech2011-2022MarTechMarTechMarTechMarTech M&MS1 2341287.86%15% AICRM2014AICRMAIUdeskGaussMindServiceGoSCRMCusBridge500500AIUdesk GaussMind1Udesk234Insight5GaussMind660MRP70-80MRPSAP90ERPGartner GroupERPSAPOracle2000-2013ERP20134.0ERP 2021136216.9%20262979ERPAIVirtual Sample 1281220%-30%3453DVersekitAIVRRevofim Studio--1FILA90075%21/52017BITOBITO:BFMSBANSBSLAMBWMS3CERPMESBITO123180%23100%456ERPERPERPERP1996-2006AribaCoupaSRMSupplier Relationship Management/B2BAribaCoupa-AribaCoupa20213.2202342016-202311.22%windB2BB2BSaaSSpend Insight 2016SaaSValue as a Service1234123413.75213%350%4100%SaaS2005WorkdaySaaSHR SaaSHRSaaS2008IaaSSaaSHRSaaS2015SaaSSaaSHRSaaSHRSaaSBelloMoka2016-20201.182.0314.5%HR SaaS2015HR SaaSIDC2020HCMSaaS4.66 37.5% SaaS 2025HCM SaaS19.933.7%AI eHR RPA 1231Bello-23API11000HR/2600%350%415%RPARobotic Process AutomationRPAUiPathBlue PrismAutomation Anywhere2008Blue Prism RPA500BPORPA2015-2016RPA2017RPARPA2019UiPath702019RPA2019RPA13.362023RPA39.032018-202336%RPA2019RPA1.642018-202364%202310.17IDC FutureScape:2021202445% AIRPARPARPARPARPARPA20199724RPARPA202111RPA500 4000 1 2100016Low-CodeNo-Code/AppianOutSystemsZapierCoherent2014ForresterLow-Code2015AWSGoogleOracleAppianOutSystems2015/AppianOutSystems2019//20208420212025471/20202.821920226.33202521.14/5%//// 4 2015 7 33 50 19 31 6 1231230023IT03PART THREE/SaaSSaaSITSaaS12/3 4123PLM3D202111IDC 2022ICTIDC04PART FOURIT/ITCIOCIOIT/DT41nBIMAIITDTCEOEasonB2BGartnerCIOCMOCTOCEOB2B, ULI2023ULI 4.5 1936 80 uli.org TwitterFacebookLinkedIn Instagram ULI Randall Lewis ULI Randall Lewis Center for Sustainability in Real EstateULI Randall Lewis ULI ULI Americas Sustainable Development Council ULI SDCSDC triple-bottom-lineULI ULI Asia Pacific Resilient Cities CouncilULI ULI ULI Europe Sustainability CouncilULI .Ferguson Partners Ferguson Partners 1130 Ferguson Partners Ferguson Partners 2023ULI 2023 2023 2001 L 200 20036-4948 ii2023ULILucy A.Scott PEI Marta Schantz ULI Randall Lewis Emily Zhang ULI Lindsay Brugger ULI Sophie Chick ULI Lisette van Doorn ULI Joey Udrea ULI James A.Mulligan Sara Proehl LLC Brandon Weil Hayley McMillon 2023ULIiiiULI Mark BhasinNYU Stern School of BusinessKatie BlumEast West PartnersDavid CropperSan Francisco Bay Area Developer and InvestorCarlos de IcazaCreelJohn EddyArupDavid FordWalter P Moore and Associates Inc.Andy GowderAusten&Gowder LLCJulie HiromotoHKSSonia KhannaForbright BankVarun KohliBattery Park City AuthorityMelissa KroskeyWoodWorksJon MoellerBlocPowerBrandon MorganVulcan LLCBen MyersBoston PropertiesScott ParkerDesignWorks,L.C.Julianne PolancoClimate Heritage NetworkByron RenfroOrchard Commercial Inc.Rob RydelOZ ArchitectureJudi SchweitzerSchweitzer&Associates Inc.John ShardlowStantecJack SmithNelson Mullins Riley&Scarborough LLPRives TaylorGenslerPeter TomaiSpecific Performance Inc.ULI Chris BrookeLink Asset ManagementMaggie BrookeProfessional Property Services GroupNicolas BrookeProfessional Property Services GroupChungha ChaReimagining Cities FoundationBernie DevineYardiScott DunnAECOMEli KonvitzAtkinsMavis MaGreen GenerationBuds WenceslaoD.M.Wenceslao GroupULI Clarissa AlfrinkUNStudioStan BertramPGGMEric BloyaertATENORSADaniel ChangHines Julien DaclinAllianz Real EstateBen DaltonOrion Capital ManagersJi Won DaunisAllianz Real EstateStephan DeurerECO OFFICE GmbH&Co.KGCharlotte JacquesSchrodersInger KammeraatMVRDVStephen LawlerValue Retail Management LimitedMarie MaggiordomoGoodman Management ServicesElsa MonteiroSonae SierraMonica O NeillImmobel Capital PartnersAyosha OrthBuildingMindsLars Ostenfeld RiemannRambollJorge Prez de Leza EguigurenMetrovacesa S.A.Manuela RaininiAllianz Real EstateRoger ToussaintLongevity PartnersCees van der SpekEDGEPablo VillarejoTechnical University of MadridMax WalmsleyLaSalle Investment ManagementChristina ChiuEmpire State Realty TrustPeter CosmetatosCommercial Real Estate Finance CouncilJonathan HannamTaronga VenturesDavid IronsideLaSalle Investment Management Pamela ThomasCPP Investments2023ULIiv2 3 4 ESG7 10 14 17 20 ULI 2023 ULI ULI ULI ULI 2023 ESG- Ferguson Partners ESG ESG ESG ESG ULI ULI Matthew HardyFerguson Partners ESG Gemma BurgessFerguson Partners 22023ULI2022 ULI Randall Lewis ULI ULI ULI 2023 ULI ESG 2022 COP27ULI 2023-ESG- 2022 10 1.5 2030 93%ESG ESG Katharine Hayhoe 2023 32023ULI1 ESGELSA MONTEIRO Sonae Sierra41 ESG 2023 2023 -ESG - 39% 2% 85% 2.2 200152023ULI 2030 3.5 3.7 Green Finance Institute 1%/ ESG ESG Encore David Ironside 2022 1200 - Taronga Ventures Jonathan Hannam Max Walmsley62023ULI2 SCOTT DUNN AECOM 72 TCFD2022 ESG 2024 2023 TCFD 2022 11 2024 3 -- 2022 11 1 2 3 202382023ULIC Change ULI 2022 10ULI ULI Lisette van Doorn Max Walmsley 2050 Green Generation Mavis Ma Ben Myers LEED ESG CPP Investments Pamela Thomas Christina Chiu C Change: 92023ULI3 INGER KAMMERAAT MVRDV10 2023 ESG -- ESG S 115 47 ULI --3 112023ULICropper 2023 Neuperlach Hinesaer- 10,000 Value Retail Management Stephen Lawler --ULI David Cropper 122023ULIClimate Heritage Network Juli Polanco Polanco HKS Julie Hiromoto Hiromoto ESG -ULI 132023ULI4 MARGARET BROOKE Professional Property Services Group 14 2023 Sonae Sierra Elsa Monteiro PGGM ESG Stan Bertram ---Sonae Sierra Elsa Monteiro -4 152023ULI Professional Property Services Group Margaret Brooke 162023ULI5JI WON DAUNIS 17CREFC Peter Cosmetatos ESG . . Ji Won Daunis 2025 25% 2050 1.5 CRREM GHG - EPC 5 182023ULI10192023ULI Charlotte Jacques 2023 /Jacques ESG ES 2023 -202023ULI 2001 L 200 20036-4948uli.org, 202231.pdf, 202021202234=//20221-420211-4HRTABLE OF CONTENT20221-420221-420222116%2022342022331120222116 212022136%2022216%29%32%20223436%-41%-20%-39%-30%-40%-38%1)2%-41%-25%-23%-38%-27%-13%-50%-56%-39%-33%-39%-21% 221-4211234-36%-31%-41%12341-42122125%IT2112%125%66%-18%1%92%-21%-18%-29%-24%-26%-12%-11%-3%0%-48%2%-13%0%-29%-235%3%-31%-29%-12%-68%-26%-9%ITMCN/1-4212210%342132%22210%34448%-32%-21%-25%12341-42122-40%-32%-21%-31%-34%-23%-5%3 %3%7$%-24%-28%-9%-26%-17%-5%-28%-48%-18%-21%-25%-7%12342022331134.2 22112.1%2022223%33114419.647.4%9.310.623.613.38.218.731.719.6-12.10u.504.20G.40%1234212220221-47%202231-8.48%3.27.90.36%3.33 .91%1-42122456%82%IT61.7%HR456%2022Q1456%-36%-31%-41%-20)%-25%-56%123420221-482%314182%18%ITIT20221-4ITB AppNIOSoul20221-4TOP15BBBTOP155ITIT20221-4IT|BBNIOAppNIO20221-4TOP1061.7%HR61.7%HRHRoffer3HRoffer961.7%11.5%26.8%822.63offer1187.27.38051015202530354045 SheinFreetech--offer51.7%33%51.7%48%51%18.4%18.4Q.7).9%60%33%31%33%/20%31%13%3%/21167.71Y.11PC.02y.91R.33v.58%0%0.00.00 .000.00.00P.00.00p.00.00.00%THANKS, 20222022Contents 0 01 1 0 02 220221170 03 3 2024 19.3 45 (2025)20225G2016201620172017201820182019201920202020202120212022022 2 /010203040502016201720182019202020212022E0.0%5.0.0.0 .0%.0020304050602016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022E%20222016-2022 2022 50.2 202240.120221172022202242.74%28.21%12.82%9.40%6.84 22202211711720221202510%20221202212022220227202285G20228202211202211104732292218555051015202530354045505GIPv66G4213850510152025303540454122151486051015202530354045/2022202220226259464341353524140102030405060705G20221175G5G2022BIG DATABIG DATAAIAI5G5G1599760246810121416/129765502468101214121296502468101214988650246810/9866024681020225G 2022 2022 5G5G2022 2022 6842413838220102030405060708020221172022282014101080510152025305G30241412886665051015202530355G9986602468105G1919188650510152011865550246810125G2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 5G 5G 5G 5G 5G 5G 20222022 2022, 11B2B1.2022228A33A413AASDRMQL418426428B2BB2BW W HB2BTRAFFIC TO LEADS()LEADS TO CASH()MQL/ROI/03Leads/ROI/01MQL/ROI/02B2BSTEP 1STEP 2STEP 3STEP 4A/BB2B&SEM& &/B2B1.API//http/Kafka/SDK/UTM//Data Lake///Marketing////2.//3.1.5B2BCRMBICRMConvertlab/H5EDM/SMSLog info management Open ID Open ID DATALAKEB2BB2B1.CTA2.PR3.VS1.5B2B1.Single-Touch AttributionFTAFirst Touch AttributionLTALast touch AttributionLCTALead conversion touch attribution/LNTALast Non-Direct Touch Attribution2.Multi-Touch AttributionLALinear AttributionTDATime Decay AttributionUU-Shaped AttributionUWW-Shaped AttributionWBLRBagging Logistic RegressionBootstrapSPMSimple Probability ModelTWATime-Weighted AttributionApriroriB2B1.2.A/BA/A3.STAMTA4.BOBB2B//CTA/B2BROIMMMDigitalCB2BVSLed-GrowthB2B1.2.3.4.12Martech762000B2BKPI713 200011, &202354.pdf, 2023.02.152023GMV1500****20206122021623%7GMV10020224 App710003771008GMV77040%LBS/POI*APP2022 130,000 1012 22 298%105%58%53%20%9%*202220222022 19,000 2022 3,783110,195 123,625 177,395 010,00020,00030,00040,00050,000-50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000221022112212TOP1000**1TOP100032,585 40,495 3,117 3,570 7,439 7,849 01000020000300004000050000020004000600080001000022112212*1TimsIP GMV2000W 35%7.226,445GMV8320W2,452,627IPUGC8850%300 GMV167041%19%3019GMV42W3,240GMV55.7;GMV44.273GMV1000ROI18197,9133 7GMV100 LINLEEGMV16497025,0192000GMV2728 404,985 66GMV1084 32,041GMV2123 7000 47,876* VS VS//*12.1%21.8%15.9%21.4%18.4%10.2%*N=527182240.8#2735.7(3316.937%88RaeYUP% 2022*N=52789sqXSc22232728333320222BCCTV%4%6%9X%2022*N=52759G #%8%6#%66-1010-1515*N=527202232$GG%100100-500501-10001000202216)269DEEQ%////*N=5275 $7%*N=527844(bU3% 81f4%65E(D%76 84 83 165 18222327283333TGI*33*TGI=/*100*N=527DAMAI*CRMMACDPOne ID/DMPAI&POSPOSCRMOne IDOne IDCRM/CDPOne IDCDP*POSPOSPOSCRM/CDPCDPPOSCRM/CDPA/B Test/CRM/CDP/5ACRM/CDP* SPUSEOGMVSCRM*GMVBD**2223202281070602000GMV900GMV166GMV43%700*APPA/B Test30%CDPIDOpen ID2022 9*CDPIDOpen IDLTVAPP202225%-30%202215%20223%-5%20223%NEWNEW20224.570%LTV*IDBOM *57669300003400024000230008900002000040000600008000010000002468102292210221122122311000 12320228312040ROI450TOP2GMVTOP4GMV35%50530%*, 202320231 1 400400 6060KuRunDataKuRunData4 400000-60-66060&&Q4.01010202030304040505Q3.5%555GG%12345Top2 =82% B 85858585Q6.15.12.1R.8%5.9.6v.5%8595Q7./V////9595/A14.16.0.0.3.3.2.21.31.3A.6A.68.98.9Q.2Q.2B.1B.14.54.53.03.06.06.0 .0 .0.6.6.9.9.8.86.36.3E.6E.6B.1B.1R.1R.1D.4D.41.31.34.44.4.2.2.9.9.0.0 .4 .4.7.7.4.44.74.73.33.3I.7I.78.18.1.1.10.60.6(.6(.6!.8!.8%0.0.0 .00.0.0P.0.0%8595V/////Q10.A8.553.2F.99.74.01.8).8).8.8%.6#.9!.2%/1 1 2 2 Q12.Q14.VSVS DHADHAQ15./01D D0202QQDHADHADHA03030404A3.18.6.1.2%9.1%7.3%4.3%3.9%3.2%2.5%2.1%1.6%1.1%1.0%0.5%/heinz/enoulite/garbath/littlefreddie/bellamys/happybabyA4.A6.A7.285879/heinz/heinz73sHH456965e426466f8815457W)44356V33b54260$Q94245E&%/enoulite/enoulite/garbath/garbath/littlefreddie/littlefreddie2436/bellamys/bellamys11PPQ52756V33102442B00102148H001547G15/happybaby/happybaby4071070pCC%31%60%Q16./heinz/heinz/enoulite/enoulite/garbath/garbath 0-6/littlefreddie/littlefreddie3-63-61 13-63-6A1.87.7g.5Y.1W.1I.8.1.66.4T.5&.4.5.4.3v.3Y.1b.4c.4C.0.9d.6.8h.7.9d.6%11-33-69595A9.19.4).0&.2.2%9.3.7B.2.7.9%5.4%80%60%50%60%80%8595Q24./9595858595951 1S10.858595956-121-11-22245.6(.0.7%3.7S.32.4.2%1.28585859595858520020066f%959520020049.7I.7%A2.8585959550/3.1Q-100/6.21-200/24.7 1-500/40.9P0/ 25.1P/ 4.1Q-100/ 5.41-200/ 40.8 1-500/ 39.5P0/ 10.2%1 12-32-3S11.6-126-121-31-33-63-612-312-316.75.02.5%8.6%7.1%9.9(.95.5.9.7.23.32.8%8.1%8.6$.2E.5(.3%2.0%0.0%Q26.858585859595A11.A12.,59.8Y.8%,38.18.1%,40.2.2%,61.9a.995A13.71.5q.5i.2i.2R.3R.38.48.46.06.05.55.5.3.3%Q25., 20221220226802022142022----20-62 818-23HR Link-U251202220252018201920202021E2022E2023E2024E2025ECAGR(2021-2025)/280825772531263827432825288229403.0%/%/-8%-2%5%4%3%2%2%/Tesla/%4.5%4.7%5.4.5.5#.50.08.0%//126121137330507664865111752%/%/-41T10)%//181918441409148615751638170417554.5%/%/1%-24%6%6%4%4%3%//%2.1%3.2%9.9.5.0.0(.06.0%//395914020126836047763235%/%/537D3522%//177017481445154615931641167317073.4%/%/-1%-17%7%3%3%2%2%//%2.0%1.8%2.3%4.0%8.0.0.0%.0%//3532336212721331842767%/%/-10%46gI4%//310829612412260527352817290229894.4%/%/-5%-19%8%5%3%3%3%//%0.3%0.6%0.7%1.2%2.0%3.0%4.0%5.0%//10161831558511614953%/%/63tuU7)%//950691307797827586478922916193903.8%/%/-4%-15%6%4%3%3%3%//%2.2%2.5%4.2%7.5.1.8.4$.8%//20922732762395713221776232548%/%/9DT841%/ 2021660/352/21520252102(1)433.59%104566031.25%21 56CAGR48%202511176324275CAGR52%67%35%220221-9TOP20CleanTechnica20221-920221-911,175,66717.25%2909,04213.34%3354,5945.20%4281,0154.12%5236,5913.47%6197.8132.90%7184,3882.71%8182,6622.68%9169,3012.48162,9282.39159,4972.34156,3742.29144,1322.11132,8231.95126,0371.85123,7521.82110,2631.62100,4791.4798,5991.45 96,0891.41%TOP205,102,04674.86%1,713,23625.14%6,815,282100.00%3202219TOP2020221-9XTOP 209600032022680220221-9/TOP20CleanTechnica/20221-920221-91Model Y522,6547.67%2Model 3336,8654.94%3MINIEV316,2564.64%4PlusBEV PHEV285,7054.19%5PlusBEV PHEV234,3873.44%6BEV PHEV179,8362.64%7EV127,5891.87%8Plus EV116,5091.71%9ID.4115,1771.69BEV PHEV94,5201.39Aion Y81,2011.19QQ80,7441.1877,4411.14One EREV76,8051.13IONIQ 575,3671.11Aion S72,0001.06V71,5721.05E-Star70,9041.04EV661,3740.90 56,4050.83%TOP203,053,31144.80%3,761,97155.20%6,815,282100.00 224202219/TOP2020221-923000Model Y/3/Plus430%5%9% 5 105202267202219 20221-9471.7/456.7120.0%/110.0%20221-923.4%7368.2357.8100%97.9%103.398.7190%170%4 202275%20229-1030%850%98910112015-2025 2020 102025960056.5%2020 202536.9%11520221-9*20221-920211-911,152,856321,756258.3).7%2325,036281,26115.6%8.4%3318,151204,68455.4%8.2%4205,31744,914357.1%5.3%5184,92282,532124.1%4.8%6179,86954,950227.3%4.6%7119,35953,241124.2%3.1%8109,78441,427165.0%2.8%998,55356,40474.7%2.592,89384,7319.6%2.487,60227,817214.9%2.386,92755,27057.3%2.282,43466,39524.2%2.173,56442,51873.0%1.965,57335,95682.4%1.7%Top153,182,8401,453,856118.9.1%12202219142021-20221005101520252021.112021.122022.12022.22022.32022.42022.52022.62022.72022.82022.92022.1020221-9810115.2929.7%32.531.828.4%8.2%124-101320212022-WWW.ASKCI.COM1995206200330,000150ONE2022122688414110344167114960000000202102300490055394323771385899433709476491348514087202011802691447262221481834244527113504369246460-17ONE2020202218 201572016IT01000200030004000500060007000800090001000011000120001300012345678910202120221010,0591-1032.0%152022-16 201411TPGGICIDG2018912HUDMobileye 7 P7Xavier13151213360 (HUD)-/ / FPGA/GPUSoC/MCU36019 GNSS IMU19 ICV Tank 360 Research Reports 2020-2025 138 270 20CAGR 15.7% 64 230 20CAGR 29.2%820:2015202521:22/ /CINNO Research3 20222.7 0.30.121 ADAS 22L2L3 L4/L5 811 12 150-200 ADAS 400-500 ADAS 2021 454 2025 9222021-25 CAGR 19.4%20221-7Level2Radar1Radar25Level3Radar1Radar45Lidar2Level4/5 Radar4Radar48Lidar4Lidar4/92015-2025ICV Tank360 Reports 14.2%21.9%24.9%-16.0%147.6% 2336024202033%3%4%5%5%5%5%82%CMOSMobileye26:20211-720221-72,162.092,468.1614.20%344.26419.721.90%1,028.031,284.4824.90%642.06539.49-16.00%19.448.02147.60%128.35176.4637.50%23:/FCWLDWTSRACCPCW4550%/LDW4///24:25:202010 12526CMOS 1 Mobileye2015-2020 2015 5961 2019 11664 2020 10964 32% 1 8% 2 5% 32520226Top105%5%6%7%7%8%8)%20226Top10*1KK=10011.35KK20.60KK30.55KK40.40KK50.38KK60.35KK70.35KK80.30KK90.25KK100.22KK27:20226Top101234567891011TTE12131415LG1617(AR-HUD)181920Tesla 202261.33KK27202811 28-29:2020202630:2020202629 ICV Tank 2021 88 5.5 2022 102 6.4 2026 145 9.7 306231:202120251232:20142023 ICV Tank 2021 12 28.6% 2022 36.5%2025 55.4%31 leadleo 2020 51.7 2023 62 (32)1220183%6%2)1%35:20172022201819.3%1.3%5.6%4.4.3 .21.0%2021Top101627384951034:2021Top1036: DIGITIMES Resarch 2021 118.1 55.1 63 2022 159.6 84 75.6 35 30%1 28% 2 15% 3361333:2018 2018 31.0% 1 20.2%218.3% 3 5.6% 1.3% 5 633 Top10 3 3438:20187%3%3%3%3%4%4%7%7%7%7%7(%ValeoLuminarDensoCeptonInnovizIbeoVelodyne37:YoleVelodyneVelarryVLSVLPHDL4000-75000QuanergyS3M8250InnovizInnoviz OneInnoviz Pro900CeptonVista-XVista-PSora-PHeliusNova1000IbeoBeo NEXT15000LuminarHydraIris1000OusterES2OS0OS1OS23500BarajaSpectrum-Scan LiDARPandarGTMEMSPandar128/64/40PandarXT8.94-11.38RS-LiDAR-M1RS-Ruby/RS-LiDAR-32/RS-LiDAR-16/RS-Bpearl-ML-330sML-Xs- HAP Horizon3999-9999CH128/32/16 MS-C32/16 8000-2899996MEMS LiDA R2.0200MEMS Homrn-RTHorn-X2-16Tensor-Pro-32R-Fans-32-WLR-713WLR-736-39:14 Tier1 L3 Yol e 28% 1 10% 2Luminar////Cepton 7%/ 3%372020-2026 ADAS 7% 51%38 2041 Patience Consulting Velodyne Velaray 700 19.2%39 75000 50 Sino-GlavoNexperia/0-100m0.1-10m200-250m200m///9020-60cm/1-21mm/1/AI3D///4-20030-40030-4001000-75000-20KHz30GHz-300GHz100000GHz/LDWLKAPCWACCBSDAEB40: 2020 66.7% 29.6% 1.9%40 15 Model3 202281210- ET7 2022111251MEMS1550nm P7 2021 480E141250- G9121252MEMS one 202151250- L9111251 W6 2021 71250- M7111253MEMS L7 2022111250-iX101251InnovizS HI121363MEMSAION LX2022PLUS 80D Max121263WEY3-83IbeoFlash41254MEMS96 S13125299611131263MEMS e-tron61651AevaFMCW 2022DM-p51250- R7121281LuminarMEMS1550nm41:42:ES6G916 ES6G9 42// 12L1L4/L5/L3L22014-2020ADAS -Autopilot-Model3 -ADAS- D90 --CSS -ICC-2023-2025 -zFAS-A8*-ADiGO-LX*-ICC-2025/30-2040 Apollo- -xUrbanPro2007-2015ADIpsos 43: SAE L1-L5 5 L1-L2 ADAS L3 L3 43 CAGR2020-2025:21 25$22.4B$9.1BCAGR:19%$3.5B$1.7BCAGR:A%$8.1BCAGR:18%$3.8B$3.5B$0.04B$1.3B2020LiDARRadarComputing ADASCamera moduleYole44:202020252020-202517 Yole L1 6 260 L2 13 405 L3 24 2050 L4 38 3430 L5 35 3170 Yole 2020-2025 35 81 CAGR 18% 38 91 CAG R 19% 4 17 CAGR 113%44/1234567891045:/ 45 46:18 2022789.3%462022997.1%4634.2%68.1%4.8%47Top1044.0%126.6%23.7%48 47: 48:1949: 2022889.6%492022291.1%4954.0%80.3%27.2%50 50:20 Top1059.5%205.6%48.2%51 20221699.4%52202245.5%52 52: 51:21 18.7%137.5%27.9%53Top1043.0%257.1%21.7%54 53: 54:22 233-55-101010-15k/15-20k/20k/15-30k/25-40k/40k/20-30k/25-40k/40k//15k-25k/25k-60k/60k/- 55: 202255240100002000030000400005000060000355101019.89%5.88%6.32%6.76%6.87%9.65.85%.78%56: Link-U AlSaaSBig data AISaaSHR 2557: 565726Link-U Sandra.Huanglink- Nancy.Zhoulink- Viya.Dinglink- Victor.Kelink- Leo.Liulink- Jennifer.Zhoulink- Winnie.Lilink-HR HR,HRZ Link-U Link U WorkEnhance U World2015500300500100MSP, -202245.pdf, ANNUAL REPORT CLOSING THE EMISSIONS GAP THROUGH SUBNATIONAL CLIMATE ACTIONS IN CHINA20231 Annual Report|20231 1iGDP. Walahapitiya railway station Sawarana railway station     Railway stations in the southern costal railway line WebPourtant, lhumanit sest engage aveuglment sur un chemin prilleux. Mundal railway station The legal copyrights of those contents belong to the actual owners. Distance from Fort station : 139.0 km Mangalaeliya railway station Colombo Road Contact phone Number : 032-2222271 The government reduced the price of fuel effective from yesterday midnight. Madurankuliya railway station Produced by Lake House. (2020).15 VSS ()()()Bennett(2017)Bennett VSS() 33 VSS 20%B.VSS VSS VSS VSS VSS 7VSS ()VSSVSS()()16VSS ()() 7 VSS () VSS ()1.VSS VSS VSS 7 VSS VSS (ASI) VSS VSS (CARs) VSS ( 1 3 5 ) VSS VSS VSS17 VSS 2 VSS (LeBaron et al.2017Power,1997Strathern,2000)( VSS )(Marx and Wouters,2018)(Marx and Wouters,2018)VSS VSS VSS VSS VSS VSS 182004 A UTZ UTZ Control Union A UTZ UTZ UTZ 2007 A A Nepcon UTZ/A UTZ 2019 A UTZ A 2019A A 2020 A SDS VSS VSS 2. VSS VSS VSS VSS 19 VSS VSS VSS Marx and Wouters(2018) 2011 VSS VSS VSS VSS VSS (Fiorini et al.2019Marx and Wouters,2015b) 18 VSS (MSI Integrity,2020)C.VSS VSS (CoC)()()/ VSS (ISEAL Alliance,2016)(ISEAL Alliance,2016)( 8)20() 8D. VSS VSS VSS VSS Scharpf(1999)(Auld and Gulbrandsen,2010)VSS (Dingwerth,2007)(Bennett,2017)21 (Gulbrandsen,20042008) VSS (Gulbrandsen,2008)(Marx,2014)(Bernstein and Cashore,2007)(Bernstein and Cashore,2007Beisheim and Dingwerth,2008Cashore,2002)(Holvoet and Muys,2005)VSS (Marx,2017)(Auld,2014Bennett,2018Grabs,2020)(Locke,2013Marx and Wouters,2015bSabel et al.2000)(Marx and Wouters,2015bMarx,2014) VSS VSS (Collins et al.2017Fiorini et al.2019Marx,2013)VSS VSS Van der Ven(2019) VSS VSS VSS VSS VSS 22 VSS VSS VSS VSS VSS VSS VSS VSS A.VSS ( 9) 9VSS VSSVSSVSS VSS()24VSS VSS VSS VSS VSS VSS VSS VSS VSS VSS VSS VSS VSS ()VSS VSSVSS VSS 1.VSS VSS VSS VSS Evidensia VSS VSS Evidensia VSS ()() 10 (Evidensia,2019)70450VSS VSS VSS 25 1 447 205 211 31 VSS 94 93 9 VSS Evidensia 111 118 22 (Marx et al.2021) 1 949391111182220521131 Evidensia VSS VSS (Marx et al.2021) VSS VSS 2. VSS /(ITC,2021) VSS VSS Evidensia(2022)()()()()()() VSS (Evidensia,2022) VSS ()(Traldi,2021) 100 ()(Evidensia,2022Traldi,2021Meemken,2020Oya et 26al.2018) UTZ VSS VSS (Oya et al.2018Traldi,2021Meemken,2020DeFries et al.2017UNFSS,2022) VSS VSS() VSS (Traldi,2021)(UNFSSS,2022Meemken,2020) VSS 3.VSS (Evidensia,2022)()()()()() VSS () Takahashi and Todo(20132014)Haggar et al. WebPuttalam - 12:00 p.m. Colombo - 03.45 a.m. Chilaw railway station Please enter your username or email address to reset your password. WebDepartures: Tangalla- 05.10 p.m Mathari - 06.10 p.m Galle - 07.15 p.m Colombo - 10.30 p.m Anuradhapura - 03.30 a.m Arrival to Jaffna - 07.00 a.m Jaffna - 06.30 p.m Anuradhapura - 11.00 p.m Puttalam - 12:00 p.m Colombo - 03.45 a.m Arrival toTangalle - 08.15 a.m Route: 8%p.a.543210201110.41210.31310.71410.91511.11610.71711.11811.91911.92012.1202112.7White,non-Latino householdsLatino householdsExhibit 3The gap in Latino consumption based on their share of population has decreased in the past 5 years,but is still meaningful at$554 billion.The gap in Latino consumption based on their share of population has decreased in the past 5 years,but is still meaningful at$554 billion.Latino share of aggregate expenditure vs.share of population,iference between total aggregate household expenditure times Latino share of population,and current Latino aggregate expenditure.From Consumer Expenditure Survey.Source:US Census Bureau,Consumer Expenditure Surveys(https:/www.bls.gov/cex/)(2020)17.6.7 16-6.9 p.p.-6.9 p.p.12.7 2118.9%Share of populationShare of consumptionAggregate expenditure for US households in 2021 was$8.937BAggregate expenditure for Latino households in 2021 was$1.135BRepresenting agap in consumption,or 6.2pp diference with expected expenditure based on the Latino share of households$554Bcompared to$20,900.16 This is largely driven by higher spending on essentials,with half of Latino income,on average,going to food at home,housing,and healthcare.However,given that Latino households are larger than non-Latino White households(with an average of 3 people per household,compared to 2.3 for non-Latino Whites),the actual spend per consumer is slightly lower($7,100 for Latinos versus$9,087 for non-Latino White counterparts).1716 Ibid.17 Ibid.17The economic state of Latinos in the US:Determined to thriveLatino consumer needs are not being metAcross all categories,Latinos are more dissatisfied with current offerings than their non-Latino White counterparts.18 Twenty-eight percent of Latinos report being unhappy with current product offerings,compared to 21 percent of non-Latino Whites.19 Dissatisfaction represents a missed opportunity for companiesLatino consumption could be significantly increased if their needs were met more effectively.In some instances,Latinos may have a need for products in particular categories but are not purchasing,while in other instances,Latinos are buying products in categories even though they are not satisfied with the product choice,quality,or price.Product penetration among Latinos can be low:a quarter of Latinos do not currently purchase in specific spending categories(such as makeup or full-service restaurants),despite being decision makers and having a need for the product,thus creating another significant opportunity for companies.Consumer dissatisfaction varies extensively among Latino subgroups,driven by differences in education,income,background,and gender.Latinos who are less educated are unhappier with products.Their dissatisfaction scores are 14 percentage points higher than the average Latino.Those who have not completed high school are three times more dissatisfied than non-Latino Whites at the same educational level.20 Latinos from lower-income backgrounds(less than$50,000 per year)have an average dissatisfaction nine percentage points higher than the average for Latinos,at 37 percent.And first-generation immigrants are seven percentage points more dissatisfied than average.Latina women are ten percentage points more dissatisfied than Latino men,similar to the 12 percentage point difference seen between White men and women.Latino dissatisfaction with current product offerings grew significantly between 2021 and 2022 across all categories,and they are consistently more dissatisfied than non-Latino Whites,even though non-Latino Whites are also more dissatisfied than previously.Beauty and personal care,18 Dissatisfaction is measured by rating satisfaction levels between one and six on a ten-point scale.19Consumer survey,McKinsey,August 2022(n=4,400).20Consumer survey,McKinsey,August 2022(n=4,400).A quarter of Latinos do not currently purchase in specific spending categories,despite being decision makers and having a need for the product,thus creating another significant opportunity for companies.18The economic state of Latinos in the US:Determined to thriveentertainment,hospitality and travel,vehicle purchases,housing,banking and financial services,and healthcare are all categories with higher-than-average Latino dissatisfaction.Latinos are dissatisfied with current product offerings for several reasons,particularly price,lack of features,and lack of value for money.For both non-Latino Whites and Latinos,affordability and quality are the main decision drivers for purchases.High prices are linked to dissatisfaction across categories,and,given low disposable income(as discussed in the previous chapter),remain a critical consideration.A shortage of quality products and poor value for money also lead to dissatisfaction(Exhibit 4).And,while less important than price,customers are disappointed with companies that are not committed to addressing social inequities.Opportunities to address dissatisfaction:A win-win situationAddressing Latino consumers dissatisfaction could benefit both companies and consumers.Latino buyers would be willing to increase their consumption by up to 25 percent if products were more affordable,of a higher quality,and healthier;they expressed willingness to pay 28 percent more if the top reasons for dissatisfaction were addressed.Altogether,they would be willing to spend a total of$33 billion more per year across all categories if their needs were met (Exhibit 5).Even Latino consumers who are currently satisfied would be willing to pay more if product offerings were improved,with a total of$76 billion of revenue at stake.21 With$109 billion in current and potential spending at stake,companies that address dissatisfaction may benefit from additional market support.However,this is unlikely to be incremental,as much of this would be due to potential shifts in spending from one product or service to another.Exhibit 4Affordability and product quality are key drivers of dissatisfaction among Latinos.18%8%9%7%6%8%6%6%5%6%5%9%9%6%6%8%8%7%6%5%6%5%6%6%5%8%5%6%6%9%6%4%4%5%5%5 pp diferenceLatinoWhiteAfordability and product quality are key drivers of dissatisfaction among Latinos.Top reasons for Latino dissatisfaction across products and services,Each percentage is out of 100%,as question asks binary yes or no whether reason is tied to dissatisfaction.N/A if question was not asked regarding that category.Source:McKinsey consumer survey,August 2022(n=4,400)AfordabilityQualityVarietyLack of commitment to social inequitiesConvenienceNot produced/ofered/owned by racial/ethnic groupTrusthworthinessFood and beverages at homeFood and bev away from homeBeauty and personal careBankingHousehold and cleaning21Consumer survey,McKinsey,August 2022(n=4,400).19The economic state of Latinos in the US:Determined to thriveExhibit 5Latino consumers would be willing to spend$33 billion more if reasons for dissatisfaction were addressed Latino consumers would be willing to spend$33 billion more if reasons for dissatisfaction were addressedShare of Latino respondents expressing dissatisfaction with current oferings in category,7293224283027322625252528327.4.1.1.8.9%9.5.5.8%8.0.3.3.8.4%9.1,85,13,83,72,62,01,31,10,60,60,60,50,4TBD33,11454334291721121084453TBD335Aggregate yearly spend for dissatisfed Latino households,$BAdditional WTP for better products Size of unmet demand,$billion1Average yearly spend per household from consumer expenditure survey,times 19.7M Latino consumer units,times share of households dissatisfed.2Expressed additional willigness to pay if reasons for dissatisfaction were adressed.Source:McKinsey consumer survey 2022(n=4,400)Hospitality and travelVehicle purchasesFood&beverages at homeFood&beverages away from home Apparel(incl.footwear)TelecomEntertainmentBeauty&personal care productsHousehold&cleaningConsumer electronicsEducationBanking&fnancial servicesTotalHealthcareHousingCategories with greatest dissatisfaction20The economic state of Latinos in the US:Determined to thriveLatino consumption patterns:Strategic spenders,socially aware,and social media savvyThere is also a$554 billion gap in Latino consumption based on the discrepancy between their total expenditure as a share of overall US spending and their share of populationand closing this gap would require improving Latino income levels.This is in addition to the$109 billion of spending at stake that arises from Latino consumer needs going unmet,discussed above.Understanding how Latinos consume,and how their behavior differs from non-Latinos,will allow society to close this gap and realize the benefits.Latinos tend to be careful and strategic spenders,and,despite having a lower average income than non-Latino Whites,are discerning consumers with a high level of attention for sustainability considerations when making a purchase.22 They are,overall,conservative and conscious spenders.Latinos spend a greater proportion of their income on essentials compared to their non-Latino White counterparts(40 percent compared to 33 percent).Survey data shows they tend to be more price-conscious than the general US population,feel more financial pressure,and actively look for savings and deals.23 Almost half of Latinos are actively looking for ways to save money,above the national average of 44 percent.They are also more willing to switch to less-expensive products to save costs(34 percent compared to 27 percent of all consumers),and more than a third of Latinos actively research the best promotions when seeking to make purchases(35 percent compared to 29 percent of all consumers).Moreover,this price-conscious behavior supports the finding that Latinos in lower-income households(representing the majority)tend to spend less per person than their non-Latino White counterparts.As a result,Latinos,like non-Latino Whites,are increasingly looking for ways to save money.They pay similar attention to prices when shopping compared to non-Latino Whites(47 percent compared to 45 percent).Latinos may be willing to spend more on products they care about,while finding cheaper alternatives for those they are less invested in.But Latinos may also be under more pressure to save money because of their larger average household size,which necessitates greater spending on essentials.Latinos are comfortable shopping online and are engaged consumers.They are more conscious of sustainability considerations and are more likely to factor in such considerations when making purchases than the general population.24 Social issues and organic products are particularly important to them compared to the general population(a 12 and 14 percentage point difference respectively).In total,82 percent of Latinos report that they use omnichannel(online and in-store)and e-commerce platforms,compared to 80 percent of the overall population.25 Social media can be a powerful influence on consumer behavior and its effects are more pronounced in Latinos than in the overall US population.Latinos of all age groups are more likely to be influenced by social media when making a purchase,with 68 percent of them reporting that they are nudged toward certain brands by social media posts compared to 47 percent overall among US consumers.26 Correspondingly,Latinos have a higher average level of social media engagement than non-Latinos across all major social media platforms.For instance,89 percent of Latinos use YouTube at least weekly,compared to 75 percent overall.2722Consumer survey,McKinsey,August 2022(n=4,400).23 Consumer sentiment survey,McKinsey,2021.24Consumer pulse survey:February 25 to March 1,2022,McKinsey,2022(n=2,160;sampled to match US general population 18 years).25 Ibid.26 Ibid.27 Ibid.21The economic state of Latinos in the US:Determined to thriveAcross the board,the categories that see the largest influence from social media are appearance related,such as fitness and wellness services,skin care and makeup,and accessories and jewelry.However,among Latinos,influence from social media in consumer electronics and home decoration is felt significantly more strongly than in the overall population,with a 24 and 19 percentage point difference,respectively,in the percentage of respondents who were influenced by social media in purchases in these categories.28Latino consumers are also much more likely to be influenced by brands and celebrities posts on social media,and documentaries,compared to non-Latinos.Half of Latino consumers said they were inspired to purchase by these sources,compared to a quarter of non-Latinos.29 Latino consumers are feeling the inflationary pinch The COVID-19 pandemic hit Latinos hard and inflation is compounding the impact.In response,almost 80 percent of Latinos are taking action to manage their expenses due to inflationary pressures,compared to two-thirds of non-Latino consumers.30 This may include reducing savings,increasing credit card balances,taking on more hours at work or a second job,and skipping bills or paying less than the minimum due.Latinos pre-existing price-conscious behavior has been exacerbated by high inflation.A fifth are planning to cut back on spending,compared to 14 percent of non-Latino Whites,while 82 percent are trading down across categories,compared to 74 percent of non-Latinos.31 This includes adjusting the quantity or pack sizes purchased,delaying purchases,switching to a cheaper brand,and taking on more debt by usingbuy-now,pay-laterservices(a strategy that is more prevalent among Latinos than the general population by 11 percentage points).Overall consumption is expected to fall across the board,with Latinos cutting back more than non-Latino Whites.Total consumption is predicted to drop by 7 percent among Latinos,compared to only 1 percent in non-Latino Whites.32 The fall in Latino spending could account for an aggregate loss of$80 billion,close to the expected effect of reduced consumption among non-Latino Whites,at$100 billionthis despite non-Latino Whites having six times the aggregate consumption of Latinos.Non-essential categories will be particularly hard hit,even after sustaining a drop in spending due to COVID-19.Although overall spending,which dipped in 2020,has now mainly returned to 2019 levels,essential goods account for a larger share than previously.Going forward,Latinos are predicted to reduce their spending at three times the rate of the general population for essential categories,and five times for non-essentials.33 They are likely to pull back on non-essential spending by 10 percent but will only drop spending by 3 percent for essentials.34 To reduce their spending,consumers across the board are responding to inflation by choosing private brands across categories.Overall,48 percent of customers who noticed inflation changed brands,and,of this,the switch was to private brands 38 percent of the time.Latinos reflect this general trend,with 47 percent switching brands and 36 percent switching to private brands.28 Ibid.29Future of food survey 2022,McKinsey,December 2021.30Consumer pulse survey:June 7 to October 7,2022,McKinsey,2022.31 Ibid.32Consumer survey,McKinsey,August 2022(n=4,400).33 Housing,food and beverages at home,and healthcare are considered to be essential products or services.34 Consumer survey,McKinsey,August 2022(n=4,400).22The economic state of Latinos in the US:Determined to thriveMore vulnerable cohorts are likely to be badly affected by inflation(Exhibit 6).Latinos with less acculturation,a low household income level,and those with little formal education are expected to reduce their consumption by around five percentage points more than the average for Latinos.First-generation Latino immigrants are also expected to be hard hit,reducing their consumption by an extra three percentage points.And gender is a significant factorwomen are likely to reduce their consumption by a further three percentage points.Exhibit 6Inflation will hit vulnerable Latinos particularly hardWhites,non-LatinoLatinos1pp reduction in consumption than average LatinoAverage expected change in Latino consumption due to InfationInfation will hit vulnerable Latinos particularly hard.Source:McKinsey consumer survey,August 2022(n=4,400)5 pp diference 10pp diference 26The economic state of Latinos in the US:Determined to thriveExhibit 2Price and poor value dissuade Latinos from purchasing in beauty and personal care.Price and poor value dissuade Latinos from purchasing in Beauty and Personal Top reasons for Latinos not purchasing products,ach percentage is out of 100%,as question asks binary yes or no whether reason is tied to dissatisfaction.Source:McKinsey consumer survey,August 2022(n=4,400)5%4%7%6ordabilityVarietyNot meeting need of racial/ethnic groupMany products/services are not high qualityConvenienceFeaturesDont support the environmentNot animal friendly23%7%7%2%5%9%5%3%4%1%4%1%7%4$%5%5%3%1%4%3%5%9%4%1%8%3%2%7%1%3%1%7%2%4%1%4%2%4%10%7%4%3%6%3%4%2%7%3%2%4%2%2%3%2%WhiteLatino5 pp diference 10pp diference Face skin careHair careMakeupFragrance27The economic state of Latinos in the US:Determined to thrive28The economic state of Latinos in the US:Determined to thrive3.Poised for success:Latinos at work,in business,and in wealth creationLatinos play a significant role in the US economy as workers,business owners,consumers,and savers or investors.However,they face many barriers to advancing,whether on an individual or business front,and would benefit from interventions to overcome these obstacles.The private sector can also play an important role as Latinos seek to reach their full potential.Latino workers:A key pillar in the US workforceOne in every five workers in the US is Latino,and the number is growing rapidly.They earn 12 percent of wages and represent 18 percent of the workforce,making Latino workers a key pillar in the US economy.Although the COVID-19 pandemic impacted them disproportionately and Latinos are feeling the effects of elevated US inflation acutely,Latinos workforce share could increase to 23 percent in 2030.36The Latino workforce has progressed over the past decade,increasing its share in higher-paying occupations by five percentage points.Yet Latinos still face steep barriers to mobility,including wage disparity,implicit biases,discrimination,and lack of additional training opportunitiesall of which hinder Latinos from reaching their full potential.And,compared to non-Latino Whites,Latinos are primarily concentrated in low-wage occupations and are paid less than non-Latino White workers within the same occupations.Overcoming these barriers could boost their annual income by more than$281 billion,enhancing their well-being and the health of the overall US economy.37Most are born in the USAand are of prime working ageThe majority of the Latino workforce was born in the US and over 60 percent are of Mexican origin.Altogether,43 percent of Latino workers are younger than 25 years old,compared to 32 percent of the overall US population,and 69 percent are between the prime working ages of 25 and 54,compared to 64 percent of overall.38 36 Current population survey,employment status of the Hispanic or Latino population,US Bureau of Labour Statistics.
School Doesn't Prepare Students For The World Of Work, Ndis Allied Health Assistant Hourly Rate, Cdc Guidelines For Cruises 2022, Law And Order Svu Traumatic Wound Recap, Jenison High School Marching Band 2021, Articles P